MORALITY,SOCIAL WRONG,SOCIAL INEXPEDIENCY AND THE LAW.
Posts
Why States obey International Law?
It is a questionable attempt to try to define how many states follow and follow not the international law yet this law is at the centre of gravity that binds may laws. Hart on his book How Nations Behave state clearly that: ‘ Obedience to international rules as conforming or complying but never obeying’. He also adds that, almost all nations observe principals and obligation s almost all the time .Hence this whole conception wrestles scholars on the view of theoretical versus practical approach . Hence it’s an impassive idea that most state truly follow these laws among exceptional cases where the state obedience is betrayed. Primarily, the first reason is on state consent feature. The Latin clause Pacta sunt servanda and Opinio juris sive necessiatis poses that ‘treaties shall be complied with’ and ‘practice must be followed’ brings about the full idea of obedience to treaty based relations by which states enter into binding contracts wh...
Centralized Versus Decentralized Procurement
Th e concept of ‘ centralized procurement ’ Due to its topicality and relevance to the modern procurement law, has become a byword that has fuelled the public and legal debate; this is in particular on the analysis of its merits and demerits of centralized versus decentralized and the assessment over whether one of this system can prevail over the other are issues that may go beyond the scope of this blog. The challenges posed by greater supplier competition, the ever-increasing need for transparency, the demand for faster turnaround times, all underpinned by robust legal oversight have made public procurement complex, high stakes field’. In the present blog discussion herein, we shall be focusing on some of the main advantages of centralized procurement, the key disadvantages, a comparison between centralized and decentralized procurement, case studies, recommendation then finally I will draw out my conclusion. Definition P rocurement originated ...
How are Dispute Settled in the WTO?
Dispute in Latin is called disputatione meaning debate. Resolution on the other end means resolvere meaning settle. That being so, dispute resolution is a procedure of which the disputants agree to end the arguments through a third party, the primary role of the third party here is to remain neutral while still facilitating the disputants. The World Trading System today consists of National laws, plurilateral and bilateral agreements which are recognised under International law and together they govern and provide for a case in the cross border conduct of states when it comes to the exchange of goods and services. The Uruguay Round marked the completion of multi-national trade negotiations which embarked on a new trade revolution and an International Institution based of what is called today the World Trade Organisation. This institution works on trade and trade related areas of the global policy making and more so it has fostered avenues for integration and the development status of...