Introduction
Judicial independence is the concept in which the judiciary needs to be kept away from the other arms of government. The court should not be subject to government influence or any other influences that may be partisan or private.
The independence of the judiciary is established under Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya. Independence of the judiciary is a core element of modern constitutionalism and a pillar of democracy. Hon Justice Augustus Molade Akiwumi was a judge and also the second speaker of the Parliament of Ghana.
History of the Judiciary:
- Judiciary is an arm of government that comprises a system of courts of law for the administration of justice. The first court in British East Africa was established by the Imperial British East Africa Company in 1890 with A.C.W Jenner as its first judge.
- In 1895, the East Africa Protectorate was established with the Consular court to serve British and other foreign persons. However a court with jurisdiction over all persons in the territory was first established in 1897- Her Majesty’s court of East Africa which was later renamed ‘the High Court of East Africa’.
- The Judiciary of Kenya can be traced to the East African Order of Council of 1897 and Crown regulations made there. This was the beginning of a legal system where it was based on tripartite division of subordinate courts namely: native courts, Muslim courts and those staffed by administrative officers and magistrates. The first Chief Justice in Kenya, Sir Robert William Hamilton was appointed in 1906.
- In colonial Kenya the office of the Chief Justice was exclusively occupied by British nationals. Before 1895, when Kenya was declared a British Protectorate, the country had no structured legal system. The territory was administered via the Imperial British East African Company. In 1896 the territory was known as the East African Protectorate. In 1920 Kenya Protectorate and Colony remained so up to 1963 when Kenya became an independent state. At independence, Sir John Ainley was the Chief Justice who presided over the swearing in of founding president, Jomo Kenyatta. He served until 1968 when he was replaced by Hon.Justice Dennis Farrel in acting capacity. The first African Chief Justice was the late Hon. Justice Kitili Mwaliku Mwendwa who was appointed in July 1968-july 1971.The office was then taken up by Sir. James Wicks who served until January 1982 when Sir. Alfred Simpson.
- Hon. Justice Chunilal B. Madan was appointed in October 1985 and a year later he was replaced by Hon. Justice Cecil Henry Ethel Wood Miller. Three years on was replaced by Hon. Justice Robin Allan Winston Hancox, who then served from 1989 to April, 1993. He was well known for the Kenya Appeal Reports (Hancox reports) published under his editorship. Hon. Justice Fred Kwasi Apaloo had distinction as he had served as Chief Justice in Ghana and was also appointed as Chief Justice in Kenya. He was then replaced by Hon. Abdul Majid Cockar who served until his retirement in 1977. He was then replaced by Hon. Justice Zachaeus Richard Chesoni who served until his untimely death in 1999.
- Hon. Justice Chunga took over and resigned in 2003 paving way for appointment of Hon. Justice J. E. Gicheru. He came to the helm of the judiciary after serving as a judge in 1982 when he was appointed as a High Court and six years later he was elevated to the Court of Appeal where he served until his appointment as Chief Justice. Hon. Chief Justice Willy Mutunga replaced Hon. Justice Gicheru. Hon. Mutunga was appointed on June 16, 2011 after an unprecedented public recruitment exercise. Thereafter Hon Justice david Maraga then Hon.Justice From the pre-colonial to post-colonial period Kenyan Judicial system has transformed significantly to become what it is presently.
Why the Judiciary should be Independent:
- Under the newly promulgated constitution in 2010 Kenyan-Judiciary is independent because: The judiciary derives its authority from the people and vests in, and shall be exercised by, the courts and tribunals established by or under the constitution [article 159(1)]. In exercising judicial authority the judiciary shall abide by principles stated in clause two this article has allowed traditional dispute resolution mechanisms which are in line with the Constitution. As the country consists of varied tribes and beliefs, their beliefs have been used to make law hence empowering the judiciary.
- The judiciary is independent as it has its own budget and its own fund, Judiciary Fund which has been provided for in the constitution under article 173 in the Kenyan constitution. The fund is administered by the Chief Registrar of the Judiciary. The fund caters for administrative expenses and any other function to necessitate the function of the Judiciary. This is well demonstrated in case of Gladys Boss Shollei vs. Judicial Service Commission: The applicant sued the Judicial Service Commission for what she termed as an unfair dismissal as Chief Registrar of The Judiciary. The Court ruled that the petitioner had been unfairly dismissed by the respondent. In the case it was also held that the constitution is the supreme law of the Republic hence her constitutional rights had been violated in the process of her dismissal.
- In addition the Judiciary is independent as the judges are immune to dismissal from office except in cases as provided under Article 168(1) of the constitution of Kenya:
-Inability to perform the functions of office arising from mental or physical incapacity.
-A breach of a code of conduct prescribed for judges of the superior courts by an Act of Parliament
-Bankruptcy
-Incompetence
-Misbehavior or gross conduct
- A judge can make difficult decisions without fear of being sued: Fiat justitia ruat Caelum (let justice be done before the heavens fall) this maxim signifies the belief that justice must be realized regardless of consequences. This is backed by case law of Royer v Mignault in which a judge slandered a lawyer by making a derogatory remark about his abilities. The lawyer sued but the dumb judge was found to be immune from net of defamation liability because the utterance was made during a court hearing. To borrow from Justice Allen Sharp of the United States District Court (Indiana) in Sims v Kernan “The doctrine of judicial immunity affords state judges absolute immunity for past judicial acts regarding matters within their court’s jurisdiction, even if their exercise of authority is flawed by the commission of grave procedural errors.”
- In accordance with article 166, the independence of the judiciary is well proven as it states procedure on appointment of the Chief Justice, the Deputy Chief Justice and other judges. Independence is assured where the Judicial Service Commission recommends names of persons to be potential Chief Justice and Deputy Chief Justice respectively. The other judges are appointed in accordance with the recommendation of the Judicial Service Commission to the president. With approval by the national assembly and recommendations from the Judicial Service Commission is to check the president's appointments are not biased and also balance the relationship between the three arms of government the legislature, the executive and the judiciary.
- The Judiciary is independent because the tenure of office of the Chief Justice and other judges is protected by the constitution under article 167 of the constitution. Like the former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga retired at the age of sixty nine this is in accordance with article 167 clause 2 where it states that the Chief Justice shall hold office for a maximum of ten years or until retiring under clause (1), whichever is the earlier. With the Chief Justice being president of the Judiciar , it prevents interference from other arms of government.
- The remuneration and benefits payable to or in respect of judges shall be a charge on the Consolidated Fund – this is clearly stipulated under article 160(3). This is to ensure the judiciary remains independent and prevent judges from being corrupt and become impartial in the decisions they make in delivering judgments.
- For a judiciary to be considered truly independent it has to have its own budget. This is ensured by the constitution under article 173. This budget is approved by the National Assembly after submission by the Chief Registrar of the Judiciary. Hence this is to ensure the legislature checks on expenditure of the judiciary to prevent over expenditure as the Chief Registrar submits approximate expenditure of the Judiciary. A balance is also ensured to prevent the legislature from overruling the Judiciary by limiting it on monetary resources hence the term “checks and balances”.In conclusion the new constitution has provided for judicial independence which is a cornerstone among constitutions of developing countries especially in the wake of Kenya in process of leaving the ICC (International Criminal Court).
References
The constitution of Kenya 2010
Klrc.org
e-lawresources.co.uk