-

Law and Sustainable Development

Sustainable development balances the needs of current and future generations by ensuring that present demands are met without compromising future generations' ability to satisfy their own needs, focusing on the interconnection of society, economy, and environment.Brundtland Report, also known as "Our Common Future," published by the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987.   


Judge Weeramantry's opinion in the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project case highlights the importance of sustainable development as a principle that balances economic development and environmental protection.


It emphasizes the need for integrated governance that includes;-

  • grassroots participation (Gbekley et al., 2024) (Mahanayak, 2024). 

  • Effective governance of natural resources is crucial, particularly in the context of climate change and

  • biodiversity loss, as it influences 

  • wealth distribution and conflict resolution (Hickey, 2024) (Huang et al., 2024).

Aspects of Sustainable Development 

  • Intergenerational Equity: Ensures that resource use today does not deplete resources for future generations (Mahanayak, 2024).

  • Inclusive Governance: Involves diverse stakeholders, particularly marginalised groups, in decision-making processes (Hickey, 2024; Lisenko, 2024).

  • Environmental Protection: Focuses on mitigating pollution and managing natural resources sustainably to combat climate change (Mahanayak, 2024) (Lisenko, 2024).


Conceptualizing and Problematising Sustainable Development 

  • Comparative Vagueness and Ambiguity in Sustainable Development: The UN emphasises interconnectedness, and a broad range of sustainable development goals seeks to emphasise a holistic approach that includes environmental, social, and economic dimensions. The 17 SDGs address a range of issues, from poverty alleviation and education to climate action and partnerships for the goals. The World Bank focuses on economic growth and poverty alleviation.UNEP prioritizes environmental sustainability, often viewing economic and social aspects through an environmental lens.

  • Governments may focus on economic growth and infrastructure development when defining sustainable development, emphasising job creation and GDP growth.Non-governmental organisations often prioritise ecological preservation and biodiversity, viewing sustainable development as primarily an environmental agenda. Corporate Viewpoints: Businesses might frame sustainable development in terms of corporate governance or corporate social responsibility, focusing on sustainable business practices, profit margins, and brand reputation.  Local communities may interpret sustainable development through the lens of social equity, prioritising access to resources, cultural preservation, and community well-being.

  • Rights of Natural Resources and the burden of sustainability The crisis stemming from development is rooted in a prolonged and deceptive process, supported politically and institutionally by elite greed, ignorance, and an insatiable desire for wealth accumulation, all at the expense of creating a fair and sustainable ecosystem. The exploitation of resources such as oil, gas, and minerals, coupled with the abuse of state power due to inadequate governance systems, has resulted in resource mismanagement, land degradation, conflicts, and insecurity, rendering sustainable development a distant goal. This situation intertwines with the challenge of governing resources effectively, necessitating a balance between the rights of communities and individuals, establishing institutional frameworks, and ensuring an integrated approach to resource development.


  • Kleinfeia contends that some legal reforms are influenced by foreign entities aiming to promote their own interests, particularly regarding global security or the exportation of specific values, rather than genuinely assisting poorer nations in their development. This dynamic can lead to the exploitation of natural resources in African countries, primarily benefiting foreign interests while neglecting the long-term environmental and social implications for local communities.

  • Problems with Managing Agricultural Resources: Another important issue is how we manage agricultural resources. According to Okoth Ogendo, the quality of life in Africa heavily depends on a sustainable agricultural sector. This means that land policies, management of land and water, land governance, and community land rights are all crucial for sustainable development in Africa. The issue of community land is a central topic in the debate on sustainable development, which includes concerns about the tragedy of the commons. This refers to how communities can help protect resources and how laws should recognise community rights while also addressing the challenges of industrialisation and development.

  • Laws are key tools for achieving sustainable development, but weak regulations and governance can make sustainable development hard to reach. There’s also the question of whether laws themselves can be a threat to sustainable development. This article will discuss how weak governance in resource management threatens sustainable development and allows for the misuse of state power and exploitation of resources.

  • Implementation Variability-Policy Frameworks: Different entities may implement policies that reflect their unique understanding of sustainability, leading to inconsistencies and overlap. For example, a government might introduce economic incentives for green technology, while local communities might prioritise land use practices that have been historically relevant.The prioritisation of resources can differ significantly among stakeholders. Some may allocate funds for technological innovations, whereas others may invest in community development and education.

  • Indicators of Success**:What defines success in sustainable development can differ greatly among various stakeholders. For some, success might be measured by environmental improvements, like reducing emissions. For others, social factors like reducing poverty or improving health might be more important.

  • Reporting Standards**: The lack of uniform metrics across different sectors creates confusion. For example, companies may use various reporting frameworks (such as GRI or SASB) to communicate their sustainability efforts. This diversity makes it difficult to compare and evaluate their performance effectively.

  • Lack of Environmental Justice:Whether the interests of the have-nots groups can be furthered only through political, not legal, action." This highlights the limitations of the legal system in addressing environmental injustices faced by marginalised communities. For example, communities affected by pollution from industrial activities may face significant barriers to accessing justice through legal channels.

Addressing these challenges requires:

  • Integrating environmental considerations into all aspects of development planning and implementation.

  • Strengthening environmental laws and regulations.

  • Improving access to justice for communities affected by environmental degradation.

  • Promoting participatory and inclusive decision-making processes.

  • Recognising and respecting the rights of indigenous peoples.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

8 Principles of Fuller on Inner Morality of Law

-
Image
Principles of Fuller on inner morality of law Fuller’s eight principles, as a framework for a proper legal system, emphasize the necessity of clarity, consistency, and accessibility within the law. His principles reflect the importance of laws that are understandable, stable, and enforceable to ensure justice and accountability within society. Below is a polished version of Fuller’s eight principles, capturing both their content and significance:- General Rules of Conduct: There must be rules of conduct that are established and made known in advance. These rules should not be arbitrary commands but should be expressed in general terms to provide clarity. Importantly, these rules should not be retrospective, meaning individuals should not be punished or disadvantaged for actions that were not considered unlawful at the time they were committed. Publication of the Rules: It is essential that laws and rules be publicly accessible so that people know what is expected of them. The general p...
Read more

JUDICIAL OFFICERS & CONFLICT OF INTEREST CASE LAW

-
Image
JUDICIAL OFFICERS & CONFLICT OF INTEREST CASE LAW   1.       Philip Tunoi v Judicial Service Commission and another The applicants had made a formal application by notice of motion seeking the recusal of the presiding judges; t he Hon. Mr. Justice G. B. M. Kariuki, and the Hon. Mr. Justice Milton Asike Makhandia from hearing an appeal. The appeal in question concerned a petition that had been dismissed in the High Court relating to the retirement age of the applicants as Court of Appeal judges.   The applicants sought the recusal of Hon. Mr. Justice G. B. M. Kariuki on the basis that he had previously been convicted of contempt of court in the Court of Appeal by a bench that included the first appellant. Secondly, the Hon. Mr. Justice Milton Asike Makhandia regularly frequented Karen Country Club in the company of the attorney general who is a member of the JSC (the 1 st  respondent) and had regularly discussed this matter with the AG. The cou...
Read more

ADVOCATES CONFLICT OF INTEREST CASE LAWS WITH SAMPLE PLEADINGS

-
Image
  1.      Charles Gitonga Kariuki v Akuisi Farmers Co. Ltd [1] The firm of Karanja Mbugua & Company advocates had acted for the plaintiff in a claim seeking to recover a debt of Kshs. 3 million from the defendant. The defendant’s counsel raised a preliminary objection challenging the appointment of the plaintiff’s advocates firm submitting that they had acted for the defendant in several other cases. He submitted that the defendants were apprehensive that the plaintiff’s counsel would use information acquired from the defendant to their disadvantage. The court held that it is not enough for the applicant to allege that opposing counsel acted for the defendant in several matters because the simple fact that the advocate acted for a litigant does not lead per se to a conflict of interest. The court dismissed the preliminary objection on the ground that the applicant had not tendered evidence that showed that the plaintiff’s counsel had been intimately invol...
Read more